back 6-8 steps at a time.
> Jim,
> I thought that breadcrumbs was the path you took, so you
> could go back 2-3
> steps rather than using back/back, etc...
> Andy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 10:06 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Breadcrumbs - do you fully track users?
> I do both at depressedpress.com
> But in general if your going to show the traditional
> "breadcrumb trail" link
> it should only be the location of the page in the
> hierachry, not the users
> path as the former is the de facto standard. Doing the
> latter in the same
> style would just end up confusing people, I think.
> There have been several columns about this stuff at
> useit.com if you're
> interested.
> Jim Davis
> From: Michael Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 10:56 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Breadcrumbs - do you fully track users?
> What do you do for breadcrumbs on your sites? Do you
> display the actual
> route the user took to get to this page or do you show
> the normal 3-4 steps
> from the home page, regardless of the way the user
> actually got there?
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
