> with W2K3, I was wondering if I could have a more exhaustive
> response from people who have had experience with it - both
> good and bad, as to whther it is really a viable platform for
> CF hosting, or whether we would be much better off sticking
> to W2K.
>
> Also if anyone has had experience with CF5 on W2K3, I'd like
> to hear from them too - as we may still have to run some
> sites on CF5 until we are completely happy that any MX
> related (coding) issues have been sorted...
I've been very happy with it, in general, and have installed CFMX 6.1 on
dozens of Windows Server 2003 machines. In some respects, Windows Server
2003 is a bit more difficult to administer, because many things are disabled
or turned off by default, making it more secure (theoretically). I run
Windows Server 2003 on my current laptop, along with several versions of CF.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
phone: 202-797-5496
fax: 202-797-5444
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
