> I actually prefer the now dead Adobe Livemotion 2.0 to
> flash. I didn't even need to read the manuals to create
> linked rollovers... it had a superior interface and
> scripting elemets imo.

> Too bad Adobe didn't make enough off it. now I'm left with
> dead software.

I'd been told that the IDE (or maybe the player) for it was so heavy
handed that it was virtually impossible for a client machine to _use_
the software for lack of memory and/or processor power. Could just be
hearsay, but that's what I'd heard. If it's true, that would explain
why a superior interface and scripting elements wouldn't have helped
make it popular.

s. isaac dealey   954.927.5117

new epoch : isn't it time for a change?

add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1
http://www.fusiontap.com
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to