It only works with modern browseerv (FF, Mozilla)
It is mainly XML with some _javascript_
A little verbose (the XML)
But doesn't take the CPU resources that Flash does (even when idle)
It is very fast expanding tree menus etc.
Dick
On Sep 9, 2004, at 6:44 AM, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
> > I actually prefer the now dead Adobe Livemotion 2.0 to
> > flash. I didn't even need to read the manuals to create
> > linked rollovers... it had a superior interface and
> > scripting elemets imo.
>
> > Too bad Adobe didn't make enough off it. now I'm left with
> > dead software.
>
> I'd been told that the IDE (or maybe the player) for it was so heavy
> handed that it was virtually impossible for a client machine to _use_
> the software for lack of memory and/or processor power. Could just be
> hearsay, but that's what I'd heard. If it's true, that would explain
> why a superior interface and scripting elements wouldn't have helped
> make it popular.
>
> s. isaac dealey���954.927.5117
>
> new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
>
> add features without fixtures with
> the onTap open source framework
> http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
> http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1
> http://www.fusiontap.com
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
