from MM (interview, blog, user group talk, etc.) then your safe to repeat
what was said. If you are quoting someone who broke NDA and is not a MM
employee, then you may be on (semi) solid ground in repeating what was said,
but doing so may alienate people at MM. Better to be sure of the source of
information your presenting in an NDA situation.
As for the original post here, the fact that Blackstone B1 was out may have
been NDA information, but as later shown, it was public info on Tim's blog.
The fact that the original poster is on the beta program is technically a
violation of the NDA, but I highly doubt it'll be held against
him. The fact that he was excited is not covered by NDA and he can express
that as long as he doesn't go into things that are not public. On the whole,
I think this is just a lot of worry for no reason as nothing has really been
said.
Now if Ben (or someone else from MM) can post a little 'no foul' message,
everyone can stop worrying and be happy.
> Good: talking about public information
> Bad: talking about info from the beta, regardless if it happens to be
> public
>
That is incorrect. An NDA cannot preclude you from sharing information that
is already public whether you got it publicly or not.
-Matt
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
