Burns, John D wrote:
> What'd I do wrong?  I'm just using Outlook 2003.  Is there something
> non-RFC compliant about it?

You are not sending a References or In-Reply-To header as defined
in RFC 2822 section 3.6.4.

And just to make my position on SHOULD vs. MUST clear before
debate starts: MS uses the propietary header "Thread-id" to
convey the same information but in a propietary manner, from
which I conclude there are no valid reasons per RFC 2119 section
3 to ignore the SHOULD.

Jochem
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to