Ok, I understand. Sorry about that. I'll call my buddy Bill Gates this
afternoon and tell him to fix it :-) I wish it was that easy. Sorry if
it's causing problems for people. I know that this is contrary to the
RFC, but it surprises me that Gmail wouldn't handle the thread-id
automatically due to the saturation of microsoft products.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 10:22 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: How to suppress the Header and Footer info when printing
from a browser
Burns, John D wrote:
> What'd I do wrong? I'm just using Outlook 2003. Is there something
> non-RFC compliant about it?
You are not sending a References or In-Reply-To header as defined in RFC
2822 section 3.6.4.
And just to make my position on SHOULD vs. MUST clear before debate
starts: MS uses the propietary header "Thread-id" to convey the same
information but in a propietary manner, from which I conclude there are
no valid reasons per RFC 2119 section
3 to ignore the SHOULD.
Jochem
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
