Dawson, Michael wrote:
> I'm well aware of the need for a primary key, in addition to a sound
> table design, however, I'd like someone else to "word" a response for
> me.
> 
> A co-worker built a data file (a data table on an AS400) with six
> fields.  The only unique "key" of the record is the entire record,
> itself.  The combination of all six fields must be used to identify the
> exact record.

That is probably not smart performance wise:
- you will have 6-fold foreign keys which will have to cascade on 
every change to the record
- your PK-index will be huge
- some of the fields are bound to be non-unique thus reducing the 
efficiency of an index

Additional storage requirements of adding a field are easily 
offset by the reduced storage requirements of having an index 
over all six fields.

Add in a bit off application developer convenience and your 
co-worker has to come with better arguments to convince me.

Jochem

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net
http://www.cfhosting.net

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:183718
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to