My apologies.  I should have said Business Basic.  We were taught bad
database design skills.  Luckily for me, I had other RDBMS experience
before I started.  I did have many problems with RPG programmers who
designed poor tables in a previous job.

Russel Madere
Webmaster
504.832.9835
SunShine Pages by EATEL
www.sunshinepages.com
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 9:00 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: RE: Primary Key Justification

I'm not sure I completely agree with that statement about RPG
programmers - I 
began my career doing Relational Database design and programming for
OS400 
using RPG.  Their design and development (if done right) should be
completely 
sound, maybe more so than what's produced by others.  One thing you've
got to 
keep in mind is that the old school RPG developers dealt with machines
that had 
serious memory limitations... and so OS400 also had these limitations.
For 
example, variable names couldn't exceed 6 characters... allowing more 
characters meant using up extra memory.  The same line of thought
applies to 
table, procedure, and column names as well.  That said, anyone with a
lot of 
experience in RPG needs to do a little reading and get with the times if
they 
want to do database design using modern hardware and/or modern
software... and 
I'd encourage them to do so.  Developers that have never worked within
the 
limitations that older systems used to apply don't really appreciate how
easy 
they've got it ;)

~Simon

[snip]


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net
http://www.cfhosting.net

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:183867
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to