Claude, My question was worded that way due to the way his statement was worded. I was simply curious what he felt was, I was not hinting towards anything with the question just being curious since his statement to me implied that he thought there was a general better solution. I always find Dave's posts interesting and have over the years, has certainly led me to investigate various things on my own to see what they are all about.
I agree with most of the points you made in your various emails on this subject. I for one do not try to do OO, FB, Mach-II, or whatever just because I feel it has to be done no matter what the projects needs are. I am always curious as to why people use some of these things and yes I do use some of them sometimes. However usually the reasons I see stated are just the same rehashed reasons and often I wonder if people use them because they are "sheep" or truely because the reason they gave. BTW, I am a "sheep" at times so I mean nothing insultive with that comment. :) -- Aaron Rouse http://www.happyhacker.com/ On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:01:39 -0500, Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Which language do you think is ideal for OO web programming? > > Now this is a bad question. > One should ask "Which language is ideal to do what I have to do". > OO programming is a tool, not a goal, if it is the best tool, go OO, if > something else is better, > simpler or whatever, for Christ sake, use it ! > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - RUWebby http://www.ruwebby.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:185669 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
