I've been down the 'universal base' road and kicked myself for it later, but I can't really articulate why as, in my head, it's still specific to the situation I was in. What would be some of the reasons you'd avoid it, Sean?
-joe On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 18:23:57 -0800, Sean Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 18:32:42 -0600, Andy Ousterhout > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to name a CFC "OBJECT" but need to know if it is a reserved > > word. > > Um, it's not reserved but I'd be wary of a CFC called "object" from a > logical model point of view... It sounds like one of those "universal > base classes" which are almost always not a good idea. What are you > trying to model? > -- > Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/ > Team Fusebox -- http://www.fusebox.org/ > Breeze Me! -- http://www.corfield.org/breezeme > > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." > -- Margaret Atwood > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - RUWebby http://www.ruwebby.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:188181 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
