Spectra nuff said
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:34:25 -0500, Adrocknaphobia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You what bothers me about MM? Nothin. Well except Generator, and I > swore a blood oath to hold that against them for atleast a decade. > > Outside of that.. DW is fine. You know its the skills that make a > developer, not the IDE. Seriously... how long are you going to > continue to use an IDE that was written in Delphi? New trick old dog? > Too comfy? > > Flex is priced just right, and when all you kids started ranting about > the cost, they allowed you to get developer version for free. > > They turned CF into an Enterprise application server when it was was > gettting very close to becoming legacy keeping your butts employed. > > Breeze rocks. Period. > > Flash is nice. > > JRun is pretty a good J2EE server (for the cost). > > Yeah! Whats goin' on Captivate! Your little brother RoboDemo sucked, > but you make Camtasia look like a little girly man. > > Umm... am I forgeting anyone in my call out? > > Oh yeah.. Contribute and Flash paper... v1 not so good WPS... hott! > > Actually the only thing I hate about MM is those god darn dataDirect > drivers for Oracle. Single handly ruining my day.. every damn day. > Damn you dataDirect.. damn you straight to... > > On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:44:52 -0500, Burns, John D > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wish that RDS allowed user accounts or something like that for greater > > flexibility. However, I do agree with Dave Watts that anything that > > allows HTTP modification of files on my server makes me leary. I > > wouldn't allow something like that on a production box, though on > > development it would be nice to have additional flexibility. > > > > John Burns > > Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer > > AI-ES Aeronautics, Web Developer > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 6:18 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: John Dowdell Wants to Know What's Wrong with Macromedia > > > > Yea, I wish that sandbox could be used in conjunction with RDS... didn't > > it used to? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 10:06 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: John Dowdell Wants to Know What's Wrong with Macromedia > > > > Agreed. We don't let anyone touch the production boxes at all. They get > > synced by an admin from test. > > > > One thing RDS does that WebDav doesn't (afaik) is expose every > > datasource on the box to every user, regardless of sandboxing. That's > > why RDS is disabled on all of our shared boxes (dev, test and prod). > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, 11 January 2005 4:24 > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: John Dowdell Wants to Know What's Wrong with Macromedia > > > > > I didn't think that RDS was for production systems? > > > > It isn't. Neither is WebDAV, in my opinion. I'm reluctant to allow > > people to edit files via HTTP on production systems in general. > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:189970 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
