I disagree on pricing for Flex... 12,000 per server for presentation layer only is nuts!
-----Original Message----- From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 2:34 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: John Dowdell Wants to Know What's Wrong with Macromedia You what bothers me about MM? Nothin. Well except Generator, and I swore a blood oath to hold that against them for atleast a decade. Outside of that.. DW is fine. You know its the skills that make a developer, not the IDE. Seriously... how long are you going to continue to use an IDE that was written in Delphi? New trick old dog? Too comfy? Flex is priced just right, and when all you kids started ranting about the cost, they allowed you to get developer version for free. They turned CF into an Enterprise application server when it was was gettting very close to becoming legacy keeping your butts employed. Breeze rocks. Period. Flash is nice. JRun is pretty a good J2EE server (for the cost). Yeah! Whats goin' on Captivate! Your little brother RoboDemo sucked, but you make Camtasia look like a little girly man. Umm... am I forgeting anyone in my call out? Oh yeah.. Contribute and Flash paper... v1 not so good WPS... hott! Actually the only thing I hate about MM is those god darn dataDirect drivers for Oracle. Single handly ruining my day.. every damn day. Damn you dataDirect.. damn you straight to... On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:44:52 -0500, Burns, John D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wish that RDS allowed user accounts or something like that for greater > flexibility. However, I do agree with Dave Watts that anything that > allows HTTP modification of files on my server makes me leary. I > wouldn't allow something like that on a production box, though on > development it would be nice to have additional flexibility. > > John Burns > Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer > AI-ES Aeronautics, Web Developer > > -----Original Message----- > From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 6:18 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: John Dowdell Wants to Know What's Wrong with Macromedia > > Yea, I wish that sandbox could be used in conjunction with RDS... didn't > it used to? > > -----Original Message----- > From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 10:06 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: John Dowdell Wants to Know What's Wrong with Macromedia > > Agreed. We don't let anyone touch the production boxes at all. They get > synced by an admin from test. > > One thing RDS does that WebDav doesn't (afaik) is expose every > datasource on the box to every user, regardless of sandboxing. That's > why RDS is disabled on all of our shared boxes (dev, test and prod). > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 11 January 2005 4:24 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: John Dowdell Wants to Know What's Wrong with Macromedia > > > I didn't think that RDS was for production systems? > > It isn't. Neither is WebDAV, in my opinion. I'm reluctant to allow > people to edit files via HTTP on production systems in general. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=11 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:189977 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
