Two comments on this: 1) Doesn't HTML Tidy already validate and aid in correcting problems? 2) Why HTML 4.01? Why not XHTML which is the newer emerging standard, but close enough to HTML 4.01 that the differences are moot?
If a developer knows what they are doing (i.e. read that as experienced and good at testing), then such a tool has little value. By all means, if you're developing on Front Page, or some other obscure editor - the tool can be used to capture/identify problems. But a decent developer should be able to identify the problems simply by looking at the code (presumably while they are writing it), and doing proper testing (Test in IE, Firefox, Konqorer, etc. - to identify non-standards based issues). My thoughts. Shawn On Tuesday 11 January 2005 02:46, dave wrote: > if anyone wants to try this with cfm support please contact me off list and > i will send u a beta as long as u give feedback > > http://www.anetto.com.ru/ahc.php > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:190012 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
