I just prefer not having the two calls, since the objective is to receive what your recipients receive, and any changes to the one cfmail must also be made to the other cfmail. By simply adding your email to the recordset you ensure that you only have one place to make changes.
I recognize that a variable is likely to be used for email body and subject, but I'm also thinking about such changes as adding enctype, attachments, setting type to html, having alternate email methods, etc. There's nothing inherently wrong with two email calls, I just like to think ahead as far as reasonable and if the solution doesn't call for significant extra work, then planning for some eventualities can be helpful during the 70% of the application's lifecycle that constitutes the maintenance phase... -----Original Message----- From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 1:31 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFmail and receiving 1 copy > From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > The other solutions aren't as ideal for various reasons, in > my opinion. What si wrong with the two cfmail tag calls? 1 call passing in the query and 1 call to the 1 recipient? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Get help! RoboHelp http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=58 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:190482 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
