I use 4.1 exclusively. It's got some nice advantages over 4.0 and 3.23, such as subqueries, column-level character set support, proper handling of temporary tables in transactions, and a few other things. Which isn't to say 4.0 or 3.23 is a bad way to go, just you're goingto be missing out on some of those features. Subqueries, in particular.
cheers, barneyb On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:31:12 -0400, Stan Winchester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am using MySQL 4.1. Should I be using an earlier version? Do many hosting > company use 4.1? > > Thanks for the tech articles! > > >Could it be that you are using MySQL 4.1? > > > >http://www.talkingtree.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=alias&alias=MySQL41 > >http://www.macromedia.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=6ef0253 > > > > > >> The server and ports are correct. -- Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 360.319.6145 http://www.barneyb.com/ Got Gmail? I have 6 invites. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:192254 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
