I agree that it is hard to answer the question, just wanted to point out that I was noticing the differences in speed.
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 03:31:09 -0000, Paul Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The second link for me did take a noticeably longer time to load than the > first. The first kind of came up almost immediately. > > Strange, I tested 2 or 3 times and it was about the same... I test now and > there is a marked difference.... My comments however still stand. Without > knowing how big the original data set is what the queries look like and also > the not knowing exactly how the inner workings of QoQ function, it's a bit > of a tricky question to answer as to whether there are any ways to improve > the situation. > > Paul > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193528 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
