> One co-worked claimed he did it for performance he > thought it would parse quiker, in CF5...I disagree.
Back in CF5, I believe this was the case. Granted the performance gain would not be noticeable on a block this small, but if you have large blocks of text the gains start to add up. Spread that out over a few hundred files and millions of requests per day and your server would see the difference. With CFMX it's not an issue, but some people, myself, still minimize the text within CFOUTPUT by habit. CF5 also had some slight performance gains if you converted many (> 3-4) CFSET statements to CFSCRIPT. Again, in CFMX that is not an issue as far as I know. In any case, it's just a matter of coding style at this point. ----------------------------------- Justin D. Scott Vice President Sceiron Interactive, Inc. www.sceiron.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] 941.378.5341 - office 941.320.2402 - mobile 877.678.6011 - facsimile ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:194063 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
