I prefer cfscript when possible, because it helps one think about separating logic from presentation. And if you can move it into cfscript, then you can consider turning it into a function....
- Calvin -----Original Message----- From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 11:57 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Few cfoutput Vs Many cfoutput Yeah I've commented about this other places...cfscript is just mor comfortable for me...besides if I have a block of code dealing with structures why would i want to constantly use cfset just to call structinsert(). Adam H On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:00:07 -0600, Aaron Rouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Same here, I use it for sets and if/elses a lot, sometimes looping and > a switch/case here and there. All because I find it easier to read > than anything else. > > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:50:10 -0600, Jared Rypka-Hauer - CMG, LLC > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But I find cfscript easier to read and more flexible in some ways, so > > I'm more likely to use it for several successive sets, or for some > > loops. > > > > I never really *was* after gains in performance... cfscript just > > seemed like a nice way to write code, and overall less typing. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:194089 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
