Without writing your own validation functions for the argument types it is still needed. Would you want to write a function type for every datatype for all the DBs?
-----Original Message----- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 12:26 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFQUERYPARAM in CFC? Personally, I see no reason for a CFQUERYPARAM being used inside a CFC. It adds extra overhead and the protection that it provides should be provided instead by the CFARGUMENT tag. Does anyone see a reason for it in such a case? Data binding? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:194809 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
