so when my client is on safari and i make their site with no regards to compliency and they go look at it on safari and they cant even tell what it is, yeah who gives a crap, i mean its ok in at least in ie, just none of the others. Im sure the client will be so damn happy that they will refer me too all their friends!!
go tell a blind person that no one cares about compliancy and see which finger they give you, at least you can see which finger it is, if you wore glasses made by ms you wouldnt ;) ---------------------------------------- From: Adrocknaphobia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 5:15 PM To: CF-Talk <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Internet Explorer 7 (no really!) The only people who care if a browser is complaint are web developers. Why would anyone outside of a developer care that IE doesn't meet W3C standards? -Adam On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:47:46 -0500, dave wrote: > any browser thats directly connected to the os, should be concidered > "broken", any email client thats connected directly to the os should be > concidered "broken" > > so long as ms keeps all their products connected (for easier user > interaction, so they say) its gunna be a mess. > > And IF they actually did make IE7 compliant then that would give the users a > real choice of what browser to use and I think we know what would happen and > ms isnt about to let people have a real choice cause they will lose money. > > ---------------------------------------- > From: "Matthew Small" > Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 11:01 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Internet Explorer 7 (no really!) > > That's really a stretch... a security system broken by design? What's your > source on that? > > - Matt Small > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 10:26 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Internet Explorer 7 (no really!) > > Matthew Small wrote: > > OK, you're right... no plans to upgrade something from which they make no > > money and have no competition. I suspect most companies would do the > same. > > The promise of a new browser for a new OS is a feature of that new OS, > just > > as most any new feature is part of an upgrade. Would you ask Macromedia to > > backwards incorporate Flash Forms or CFCs in CF4.5? > > If that was the only way to stop the onslaught of patches for > never ending security holes in a product that we can now safely > say has a security system that is broken by design I would do that. > > Jochem > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:195107 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
