S.Isaac Dealey wrote: >>S.Isaac Dealey wrote: > >>>>Ack! Strawman argument! You're picking on a "weakness" of >>>>English rather >>>>actually arguing about whether pluralisation is a good >>>>thing or not. >>> >>>How about this: If you like to have singular named class >>>names, the >>>name of the class matches the name of the table and as a >>>result can be >>>automated. I.e. address.cfc matches the address table, >>>contact.cfc >>>matches the contact table and addendum.cfc matches the >>>addendum table. >>> >>>If plural table names are used, there isn't consistency >>>and as a >>>result, class names must also be plural or there can be >>>no automation >>>between the class and the table. > >>That is a red herring. > > Making my job easier is a red herring?! Damn! > > All this time I thought it was helpful.
No, I'm saying an equivalence between tables and classes is a red herring. K. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:200964 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
