None that I should really share :) but basically, it's simple:
c:\> convert myimage.bmp -geometery "100x100+0+0>" myimage.jpg This will convert a bmp to a jpeg, maximum width and height of 100px, while keeping the aspect ratio. Then you can add in extra arguments before the .jpg, like jpeg quality: -quality 50 Also, your JPEGs won't compress well unless you take out extra color profiles, using: +profile * Which doesn't work on linux (last i tried), you'll have to specify all the extra color profiles you don't want, like iptc and some others I can't remember. Your output file should be the last argument. All of this information is pretty easily available at imagemagick.com -nathan strutz DRE wrote: > Got any code samples? mountaingoat ampersand gmail.com. Either way, > thanks for the info. > > On 4/12/05, Nathan Strutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I'm on cfmx 6.1. If there were issues with cfmx & cfexecute, it was >>probably cfmx 6.0, before updater 3 (aka, a very long time ago). >> >>Alagad had an imagemagick custom tag, it was never very good. It is 99% >>easier and more efficient to run cfexecute directly instead of going >>through their tags. >> >>The docs on the imagemagick site are easy to follow (but sparse in >>examples). Most commands are the same as you'd find in photoshop, but >>processing is a fair amount faster. >> >> >>DRE wrote: >> >>>Nathan, >>>the alagad site says imagemagic isnt so good with cfmx. Are you on cfmx? >>> >>>Brian, >>>Thanks, that works nicely and I can easily modify it to suite my >>>needs. Question, have you every used the java stuff to write text >>>into an image? >>> >>>Scott, >>>195$! Gasp! I'm competing with php. >>> >>>Thanks for all the great responses. I wont waste my time with cfx image. >>>DRE >>> >>> >>>On Apr 12, 2005 2:19 PM, Nathan Strutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Imagemagick works great, I recommend it. CFExecute doesn't have any >>>>problems that I know about, it works like a dream. >>>> >>>>Also alagad & tmt image cfcs are great, also recommended & works >>>>natively, which is cool for coding. >>>> >>>>Imagemagick has the bonus ability to read nearly any image type ever >>>>conceived and turn it into any other one. It's great. >>>> >>>>-nathan strutz >>>>http://www.dopefly.com/ >>>> >>>> >>>>DRE wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Hi, >>>>>I've fiddled with some image manipulation tags and found some of them >>>>>to make jagged images on resize. Anybody know how good cfx image is at >>>>>resizing? >>>>> >>>>>I previously used imagemagic which seems very good but the docs say it >>>>>doesnt work with mx because of issues with cfexecute. Anybody knows if >>>>>this is ok now? >>>>> >>>>>Thanks! >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:202507 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
