As I stated earlier in this thread, if there were problems with cfexecute on CFMX, they were probably before Updater 3 (a long, long time ago).
Another thing I stated was to not use the alagad magick tag. It's really crappy, not their best effort. CFExecute with a quick breeze over the imagemagick documentation is all you should need. -nathan strutz Ken Ferguson wrote: > I read here on Alagad's site, that this has gotten really buggy. That's > the reason their MagickTag is no longer supported. If you are going to > use ImageMagick, you need to use < 6.0 and you need to use CF 4.5 or 5. > > I've no proof that this is true except what I read at the link below. > > http://www.alagad.com/index.cfm/name-mtinfo > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Strutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 12:17 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: cfx image? > > I strongly recommend not using any cfx tags to call it. Install > imagemagick from the imagemagick.org site and cfexecute all your calls > to the command-line exe. This ensures total compatability all the way up > > and down all versions of CFML. > > -nathan strutz > > Stan Winchester wrote: > >>I've Googled "ImageMagick coldfusion" and found serveral cfx tags that > > interface with ImageMagick; is there a preferred cfx tag? I would like > to be compatible with CF5, MX & BlueDragon 6.x > >> >>>I'm using imagemagick now, with good results. >>> >>>-nathan strutz >>> >>>Stan Winchester wrote: >>> >> >> > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:202632 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
