Maybe that was my problem... ;) I thought the WACK was a code dictionary. Hehe...
Really Ben, I don't think you'll ever know the depth of your impact on the CF community. Without the WACK I'm not sure it would have built up the user base in the early days to be what it is today. For me, and for years, your stuff was my only source of information. Now I'm curious... has anyone hand-coded all the samples to create a running copy of Orange Whip Studios? I must admit, I never did... :) Laterz, J On 5/4/05, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ROFL! > > I think the WACK is actually rather good for best practices etc - as long > as > people read the entire thing as they are supposed to. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, 4 May 2005 11:26 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX: Dissed by Breeze and FlashLite? > > >> someone who just picked up a copy of the WACK and went to town > > Oh nice, so now *I'm* going to get blamed. ;-) > -- --------------- ------------------------------------- Buy SQLSurveyor! http://www.web-relevant.com/sqlsurveyor Never make your developers open Enterprise Manager again. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:205541 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
