> -----Original Message----- > From: Damien McKenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 3:07 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Regarding Java and .NET's incestuous ties, and > Windows' future >
> > > These two statements of his strike me as utter foolishness: > > > > "...because .NET 2.0 is based on Java 1.4 (thanx to > Microsoft's recent > > re-license), whereas .NET 1.1 is based on Java 1.1..." > > Why is that foolishness? > Because it's simply not true, regarding either .NET 1.1 or 2.0. Vince ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:207905 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
