> -----Original Message----- > From: Kwang Suh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> "...because .NET 2.0 is based on Java 1.4 (thanx to > >> Microsoft's recent re-license), whereas .NET 1.1 is based on > >> Java 1.1..." > >Why is that foolishness? > > Because it's nonsense. > Besides the fact that .NET isn't "based" (whatever the hell > that means) off any version of Java, I think your > "knowledgable (sic) geek" meant that C#2.0 resembles Java > 1.5. There are no equivalents to VB.NET and ASP.NET in the > J2EE world.
He may be talking about the object model? -- Damien McKenna - Web Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Limu Company - http://www.thelimucompany.com/ - 407-804-1014 #include <stdjoke.h> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:207907 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
