My point exactly.
Not to gripe, or anything, but couldn't it be put at the END where it has less
visual significance to the reader, but is still picked up by filters?
How about it, M.D.?
pan wrote:
>
> From: "David Cummins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > How come I'm receiving all this mail with subject lines starting with
> > "[CF-Talk]"? Is this a new list policy? Its just that it adds little
> information
> > content, and means I'm less likely to see enough of the real subject line to
> be
> > bothered opening the email.
> >
> > I mean it would be OK if it was something informative like [SQL] or [CFLOCK]
> or
> > something, but [CF-Talk]?
> >
>
> Agreed - this particular tag '[CF-Talk]' makes the subject line hard to read.
> The list of current subject headers take on a numbing sameness when ALL
> are prefixed witht the same tag.
>
> Pan
>
> n.b. word to wise - if you try checking this new article subject line format
> with test messages (a time honored and sometimes necessary cf-talk 'feature'
> :) ) there is a problem child out there in readerland who will accuse you of
> rudeness and threaten to contact your "sys admin" - and she does it too ....
> with
> all of the same effectiveness as rope used for pushing a truck
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> To Unsubscribe visit
>http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
>message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
