> Out of curiosity I checked my very largest template in my > CMS. 68k and 2181 > lines. I could slice it into smaller pieces but that would > introduce > managability issues. I prefer to have the actions taken by > a template within > that same template (at the top in a switch). Not > fragmented into (in this > case) about 14 sub-templates simply for the sake of > keeping the line count > down.
> Sheer size is not an *inherent* detriment to > manageability. Disorganization > is the problem. A cleanly organized template should have > no managability > issues even at this size, other than having to hit PgDn a > few more times to > get to Item A, B or C. Hey Matt, As an excercise, would you be willing to let me have a look at the file? Though I could be wrong, I tend to disagree -- I think size is in and of itself an inherent detriment. s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://www.fusiontap.com http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:215371 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
