Jim, we plan to publish a schema for the protocol. It hasn't been done yet since the product is in Beta and want to make sure everything is done right and works as intended. When the schema is published it will be contributed to the public domain, so other can contribute and use it in their own projects.
>> -----Original Message----- > >Too true... this is what I've been ranting about. ;^) > >> Since there is no standard client/server XML protocol, our product >> (WebORB)implements something we came up - WOLF (Web Object Literal >> Format). The protocol is flexible and supports all possible data types: >> primitives, dates, strings, complex objects, arrays, pointers, etc. The > >Have you published the dialect or an XSD for it? Are you planning on it? > >It looks interesting but, to be blunt, it looks a whole heck of a lot like >WDDX (although actually much more verbose - even the simple example on the >page you reference returns a 12kb packet). > >It's definitely simpler than SOAP (which can only be good). > >But if it stays a proprietary solution I'm not sure how it will help the >situation overall. Don't get me wrong - it's all very cool stuff and, I'm >sure, insanely useful, but it doesn't seem as if you're addressing the >problem you starting talking about (lack of a broad standard). > >Jim Davis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:215631 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
