> -----Original Message----- > From: wolf2k5 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 3:57 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: [SOT] Better WDDX JavaScript serializer/deserializer > functions? > > On 10/3/05, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've got one... I'm not sure if it's "better" tho'. > > Hi, > > I'd happy to give it a try! > > Is it available for download? > You could send it by email too ...
Here's a (long) link: http://www.depressedpress.com/Content/Development/JavaScript/Extensions/DP_W DDX/Index.cfm I've not done much testing on this... basic stuff, but I may have very well introduced some bugs by stripping it into its own library. I think the speed of this SHOULD be faster than the WDDX SDK... but that may depend on the browser you use. My library still uses string processing for serialization (there's no reason not to I think) but uses full DOM processing for deserialization. Some browsers are much faster than others with DOM processing. In any case let me know if you find any bugs or issues and I'll try to fix them right away. If you do any performance testing I'd be very interested in it. Jim Davis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:219927 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
