We run it in production for our web based reporting application.

www.navtrak.net.

:) its the shizzit!

tw

On 10/22/05, Sean Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/21/05, dan martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It seems to be quite unstable compared to 5.0. The performance also seems 
> > to be worse, not better. Is anyone using this in a production environment?
>
> macromedia.com was running CFMX 7 at launch and CFMX 7.0.1 at launch.
> It's happily serving up 40,000 concurrent active sessions during peak
> morning traffic and gets a lot of traffic overall.
>
> > I have migrated from 5.0 and am starting to regret that decision. There 
> > seems to be an endless list of problems with performance and tags just not 
> > working.
>
> Contact me off-list with specifics. There certainly are some
> differences between CF5 and later CFMX versions - try running the code
> analyzer in the CF Admin which should highlight some of the main
> potential problems. The stability issues are most likely due to
> configuration / environment issues. I'll see what I can do to help you
> get up and running in a stable manner.
> --
> Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/
> Got frameworks?
>
> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> -- Margaret Atwood
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:221927
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to