I agree completely with Barney here and would refer folks to these posts by, respectively, Joe Rinehart and Ben Edwards about the "implicit" part of the invocation process in Mach II:
http://clearsoftware.net/client/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=FFC3E60A-E081-2BAC-69C5B0BD2C8DE3C0 http://benedwards.coldfusionjournal.com/machii_is_it_implicit_enough_for_you.htm On 11/19/05, Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MG has the (significant, in my view) advantage that control returns to > the XML after every controller action. With M2, you can announce > arbitrary events in your controllers, and your XML needn't care. MG > forces you to clearly document the flow through the app with the XML. > By keeping the controllers (the the UI flow) tightly bound to the XML, > you can easily see what is the controller and what isn't. > > Now if we were all infallible programmers, this wouldn't be an issue. > Controllers/Listeners are the UI controller and not the model, while > the model is what the controller interfaces with. But I know I'm not > infallible, so it's nice to have those 'guideposts' along the way. -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Got frameworks? "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:224744 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
