Hey Charlie, I didn't mean to infer compatibility issues. I think BD is an amazingly compatible product; when I've switched to it, I've barely noticed a difference.
What I was referring to is that if they've already payed a few grand for their ColdFusion licenses, it may not go so well with their bosses if they now need to buy BlueDragon as well. That's all, nothing about the product itself. -Joe On 12/13/05, charles arehart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That seems a curious conclusion, Joe. The whole reason to use BlueDragon.NET > is when a shop DOES have a large existing infrastructure in CFML and yet > needs to perform tighter integration with .NET than is possible with CFMX. > > I realize you may be inferring the possibility of compatibility issues. I'd > just like to say for the record that as BlueDragon its 4th year of existence, > many of the early compatibility issues have been removed. We have plenty of > shops who find the move to BlueDragon to be quite painless, and especially > when weighed against whatever benefit they're seeking in the move. > > /charlie > > >"Easy" depends on how much existing infrastructure and investment in > >Macr...err..Adobe CF products they have.... > > > >-Joe > > > >On 12/13/05, Snake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:226999 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
