I don't see anything wrong with the idea. I've done similar many times. The only question I would have is why you're using CFHTTP to grab the file. If it's on your server, you could do a <cfinclude> and it will drop it right in the page. I hope that helps.
John Burns Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer Wyle Laboratories, Inc. | Web Developer -----Original Message----- From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 11:22 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Whats wrong with this friendly URL idea? I have a client with a completely dynamic site that we want to turn static. As in dynamic admin area publishing static content (about 20k pages). But before we can do that there are issues that will take months to resolve (training users in the new admin area, just for starters). Runs on CF7 and a pair of MS SQL Servers. Dual procs, 2gb, win2k3. So as a stopgap to get SE crawling going while we resolve these other issues I dummied up a way that mimics what the page naming conventions will be. What I do is take db output and build a field name, like this: http://mysite.com/static/manufacturer_model_12345.cfm which gives me make and model of the product in the url as keywords, and the primary key of the db record. When someone tries to visit that page, it doesn't really exist, so a 404 is generated. CF's 404 handler then kicks in where I have code that recognizes this url as needing special handling (<cfif FindNoCase("static/",cgi.path_info,"1")>, makes a cfhttp call to the dynamic page and displays the result using cfhttp.filecontent. The client tells me that SE's are crawling these pages like crazy, and results are already showing up in Google. Clearly the use of cfhttp is a resource-intensive way to serve up a page, even if the call is to the same CF server. And I'm basically running all of this content thru a 404 handler, which is weird as well (the 404 handler can deal with real 404's as well). The added resource usage appears to be well within the server's capabilities, and its not throwing any errors. Can anyone see other problems with this solution? It seems to be working so well I'm tempted to skip the move to static publishing and call this done. -- --mattRobertson-- Janitor, MSB Web Systems mysecretbase.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:227447 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
