Actually, Enterprise Manager was REALLY slow to load about 100+ databases, so I 
tend to think it was more of a performance issue.  Especially given that it 
took MS FOREVER to release the patch.  I mean a really really long time - like 
that the lag in database name display was a problem way back in SQL 7 and went 
through most of the life of 2000.  The patch came out less than 6 months ago, 
so basically they got it out just in time for the 2005 release.  Now *that's* 
amusing.

But we all know how MS is big on security so I'm sure that played a part too.  
<g>


>I'm not exactly sure what patch you're talking about, I would have to look
>and see why the patch was issued.  
>
>As far as not announcing the username, and not putting your name on the
>mailbox, that's all security by obscurity.  It will work for a little while,
>but the problem is that most people use security by obscurity as the only
>form of security.  
>
>For example:  if you don't put your name on your mailbox, you will think
>that you're more secure from thieves, and therefore won't be as careful to
>lock your back door.  You'll think "But the thief won't know if I'm home or
>not, so he'll be too afraid to come through my back door."  This, of course,
>is ridiculous.  Instead of relying on security by obscurity, you should make
>sure your doors are locked, that you have good locks, good doors and
>windows, and a good security system.  
>
>In the computer world it's the same.  Instead of hiding your username and
>server ip, make sure you have a strong password.  Make sure you don't have
>any unnecessary services running.  Make sure that you have proper
>permissions on your files and databases.  
>
>So take it from me.  Security by obscurity only works if it's used in
>combination with other, more powerful forms of security, and most of the
>time just gets in the way of usability.  Don't let your guard down just
>because you've 'hidden' something.  The thieves and hackers have ways of
>finding that stuff out, ways that you might have never though of.  
>
>Russ
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:11 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: Professional Opinions on HostMySite.com
>
>I was watching a show about house security once, and they said you
>should never put your name on your mailbox (nor anywhere visible).  Why
>not?  Because a thief can have a phone book in his car, and look up your
>phone number from the name and address, then give a call to see if
>you're not home.
>
>Would you announce to the world what your username is?  Sure nobody has
>your password, but giving out your username (or your DB name) gives a
>hacker one less thing to figure out.  What about paths in your web
>server?  Could a hacker wipe out all of your custom tags if he knew what
>folder they were in?  Probably not, but if he didn't have to discover
>that much information, his job is that much easier.
>
>Again, I think if it weren't a security risk, MS would not have put out
>a patch.
>
>
>
>[INFO] -- Access Manager:
>This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential
>and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you are not the
>intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
>distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any
>reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission
>in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in
>its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format.  Thank you.   A2

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:229256
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to