not to change the topic, but how is BD's newest build in comparison with cfmx7 these days?
tw On 1/19/06, Yves Arsenault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe that the free version was always intended for non-commercial use. > > I think I actually question Charlie A about it many moons ago.... > > Yves > > On 1/19/06, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's what I thought too - my recollection is that it could be > > deployed for serving your own commercial app, but not for hosting > > other people's apps (an ISP couldn't install it, for example). > > > > Perhaps my memory is getting worse. > > > > On 1/20/06, David McCan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Someone I work with noticed a change in the wording of the BlueDragon > > > free edition license. The license for 6.2 says "...license to download, > > > install and use BlueDragon Server on a single Server machine for > > > development, testing and deployment purposes." The 6.2.1 license says > > > "...license to download, install and use BlueDragon Server for > > > development, testing and non-commercial deployment purposes." Note the > > > addition of the words "non-commercial". > > > > > > Has anyone else noticed this? I recall reading how we were able to > > > deploy BlueDragon free edition for any purpose (except for redistributing > > > it). > > > > -- > > CFAJAX docs and other useful articles: > > http://jr-holmes.coldfusionjournal.com/ > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230068 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
