James Holmes wrote: >my recollection is that it could be deployed for serving your own commercial app, but not for hosting other people's apps (an ISP couldn't install it, for example).
The Installation Guide says the following in section 2.1: >BlueDragon Server is free for non-commercial deployment, meaning you can use it in production, with restrictions only on redistribution and hosting. The confusion comes in when it says that it is free for deployment, and then says it is restricted to production (i.e. development). The statement is kind of vague... it could restrict serving your own commercial app seeing that would require deployment as opposed to production, or it could be restricting hosting to third parties such as an ISP would do. What I understand is that it can be deployed on a server, so long as it is not for hosting third party apps or for using with ssl certificates (which is needed for e-commerce sites). -Aaron On 1/19/06, Aaron Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David, > > I suggest you start a thread on the BlueDragon Interest list and see > what the folks at New Atlanta say about this. > > -Aaron > > On 1/19/06, Yves Arsenault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I haven't tried the new build... > > > > I seem to remember seeing new features..... from the older build.. but > > I'm not sure... > > > > Man, I'm tired. > > > > :-( > > > > I need loud music or something! > > > > Yves > > > > On 1/19/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > not to change the topic, but how is BD's newest build in comparison > > > with cfmx7 these days? > > > > > > tw > > > > > > On 1/19/06, Yves Arsenault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I believe that the free version was always intended for non-commercial > > > > use. > > > > > > > > I think I actually question Charlie A about it many moons ago.... > > > > > > > > Yves > > > > > > > > On 1/19/06, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > That's what I thought too - my recollection is that it could be > > > > > deployed for serving your own commercial app, but not for hosting > > > > > other people's apps (an ISP couldn't install it, for example). > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps my memory is getting worse. > > > > > > > > > > On 1/20/06, David McCan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Someone I work with noticed a change in the wording of the > > > > > > BlueDragon free edition license. The license for 6.2 says > > > > > > "...license to download, install and use BlueDragon Server on a > > > > > > single Server machine for development, testing and deployment > > > > > > purposes." The 6.2.1 license says "...license to download, > > > > > > install and use BlueDragon Server for development, testing and > > > > > > non-commercial deployment purposes." Note the addition of the > > > > > > words "non-commercial". > > > > > > > > > > > > Has anyone else noticed this? I recall reading how we were able to > > > > > > deploy BlueDragon free edition for any purpose (except for > > > > > > redistributing it). > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > CFAJAX docs and other useful articles: > > > > > http://jr-holmes.coldfusionjournal.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230072 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
