According to Microsoft you would need a CAL for each web user (as they are technically running queries on your database). Personally I think this is ridiculous, but this is MS's official stance. So unless you have an intranet, I'm not sure if you can get away with CAL licensing.
Russ > -----Original Message----- > From: Aaron Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 9:22 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: coldfusion and SQL2005 > > Seems like for small intranets(that out grow the needs of the Express > edition) that the CAL per actual user would come out a lot cheaper than > buying the per processor licensing. > > On 2/16/06, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > In any case, the Dell rep is wrong, wrong, wrong. This comes up > frequently > > on the list; you either need one CAL per actual user, or a per-processor > > license which supports any number of users. For most web applications, a > > per-processor license is cheaper. All of this is posted quite clearly on > > microsoft.com. > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:233071 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
