I kinda figured you would only serialize the objects you need to pass .... otherwise there's gonna be loads of overhead for objects AJAX isn't making use of, plus the danger that having everything serialized could potentially lead to a leak of sensitive information to the wrong person(s). Of course, writing a wrapper that serializes a specific CF data object and then passes that to AjaxCFC should be fairly trivial.
> Hmm, that is not very convenient. If I want the AjaxCFC > to access data from application and session scope, I have > to convert both of them to JS structures. There must be a > better way for the AjaxCFC to access persistent scopes. > Johnny >>I'd imagine cfwddx can accomplish that translation from cf >>to js for >>you. >> >>> Hi, >> >>> I am using Fusebox 4.1. Does anyone know how to pass a >>> CF >>> structure to AjaxCFC? It looks like I have to convert >>> the >>> CF structure to a JS structure before I can pass it in. >>> I >>> know that AjaxCFC can port to Model-Glue, but haven't >>> seen >>> any fusebox example. >> >>> Johnny >> >> >>s. isaac dealey 434.293.6201 >>new epoch : isn't it time for a change? >> >>add features without fixtures with >>the onTap open source framework >> >>http://www.fusiontap.com >>http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:234191 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
