thanks eric - this helps.

while i now clearly see the CF light...there's gotta be a darkside lurking
somewhere. yeah? maybe just a little bitty one?

scenario: i'm a designer trying to steer our team in a good direction but i
stop at HTML.
to me, the applications i've seen done in PHP aren't as elegant (?) as
similar ones in CFM. (PHP has that e-commerce aftertaste)

so i can feel realatively OK making a recommendation based on an internet
forum exchange :) ---> if CF is so perfect, why aren't more people using it?
i understand why coders must love it, but are users as happy? it is buggy?
slow?

thanks so much

best,

amanda



On 3/27/06, Eric Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would say mostly the coding time.  CF is close to what I would call a
> rapid application development tool for the web.  I also find it to be
> close
> to an OOP approach to programming than PHP.  The code itself is less
> intensive (though just as powerful) that PHP.  It cost more, but so does
> any
> quality tool.  I am not an expert in PHP, but if it is anything like ASP,
> you would have to spend (either in actual dollars or in programming time)
> the same amount that CF costs to get it to the same functional level as CF
> is out of the box.  The extensibility of CF is amazing.  Ben Forta, who is
> the CF Product Evangelist and General God of CF, put it best, CF is as
> extensible as your programmers.  If you can write it in a language that
> produces a dll, you can make it into a CF custom tag.
>
> You also have the advantage for your app, of real tight integration with
> flash and other macromedia and soon...adobe technologies.   The language
> itself, since it is tag based is real easy to learn.  It's outward
> similarity to HTML gives it a familiar feel that makes learning a
> snap.  Or
> those that can afford it, Fast Track to CF, which is a 3 day course, will
> take someone with no knowledge of CF and in 3 days give them the ability
> to
> write complex web apps with it.  I consider that a big huge mark on the
> pro
> side hehehe.  I am a bit biased though ;-)
>
> Eric
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amanda bradshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 27 March 2006 21:14
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: cfm vs. php?
>
> will admit upfront: i haven't a clue about CF.
>
> which is why i'm here.
>
> i'm trying to design an application where:
>
> user fills out some forms
> (submits)
> then their input is gathered + spit back out in a flash movie
>
> i've seen this accomplished in both .php and .cfm but don't know what the
> difference is between the two or the PROS/CONS of each.
>
> can someone help me figure it out??
>
> many many thanks!
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:236293
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to