But, it's the antithesis of managed content. There's no reuse of content. There's little opportunity to apply meta data. If you have multiple sites, there's no way to let one know what the other is up to via Contribute itself.
Don't get me wrong - we make heavy use of Contribute. We spent a large chunk of last year working directly with the engineers working out a bug that they didn't know existed because they'd never encountered an organization that was managing 100+ sites at a time. It certainly reduces our workload and helps users control their own content. But, _managing_ content - no, not exactly. On 3/24/06, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Contribute itself is not a true CMS - in terms of features > > anyway! > > Sure it is. It may be on the low end, but you can certainly consider > Contribute (especially with CPS) to be a CMS. You can set up workflow, > notifications, etc. > > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software > http://www.figleaf.com/ > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:237329 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
