well they didn't really pull it out from under us... it was always free for non-commercial use they just clarified the license.
I was never under any belief that I could use bluedragon server free edition for whatever I wanted - even when it still included SSL support. rick Ken Ferguson wrote: > I wouldn't, for one second, blame them for wanting to make money. That > wasn't my intention at all. I really do dislike it though, when people > pull that whole "oh look it's free" thing and then change that up down > the line a bit. It'd be like if MySQL came out tomorrow and said that > from now on if you're using MySQL in a commercial app, you're going to > have to pay 85% of the price it would cost you to buy Oracle or SQL > Server. That would not be cool. That's my only complaint. > > --Ferg > > Matt Robertson wrote: > >>On 4/12/06, Ken Ferguson wrote: >> >> >>>... So other than using it to host my neighborhood message >>>board or some such, I can't really find much use for it. >>> >> >>I can't blame them for wanting to make money off of their hard work, >>but the license change does raise the bar for them significantly in >>terms of product performance and, most importantly, code >>compatibility. >> >>-- >>--mattRobertson-- >>Janitor, MSB Web Systems >>mysecretbase.com >> >> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:237617 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
