Or use Railo instead. Or at least the technology railo uses. Railo stores queries retrieved from a datasource in a local database (in Railo's case HSQL) and then uses QoQ to query the local database. So it not only supports a larger syntax, but it is even faster. On the other hand, like Hugo posted, QoQ is really usefull in extremly rare cases. I on my side would try to avoid it as often as possible. Since you not only generate a lot of traffic, but the ressources as experienced are extremly consumed. Just think of generating a temporary table or something like that.
Gert Aaron Rouse schrieb: > Or make a query of the UUIDs and then do a join onto that within the QoQ. I > do not use QoQ's much at all and threads like this make me fearful of those > times I did use it. > > On 4/25/06, Hugo Ahlenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Or how >> about replacing the in statement with repeated UUID = "X" OR statements. >> >> /H. >> >> >> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:238618 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
