I am very curious about this. Were both installations using a seperate DB
server (to keep data delivery neutral).
This is the first time I've heard of a NT app beating a Unix app.
> ----------
> From: Gavin Lilley[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 09 October 2000 15:52
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Which Platform is most scabable for CF 4.5?
>
> Can I assume that both machines were of the same specification?
>
> I am running CF on NT but have the Linux demo ready to install. So far, I
> have found that linux is considerably faster than NT for functions such as
> news reading, web browsing, word processing, oracle and mysql databases
> and
> apache web serving. In fact I run Linux on a P2 350 and my NT machine is a
> P3 450 and Linux is faster!
>
> How come CF is different? Is CF 5.5 for linux an early development?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nagesh Kumar Deva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 09 October 2000 15:44
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Which Platform is most scabable for CF 4.5?
>
>
> hi,
>
> I tested based on some code by running around 15 times and I found
> something
> interesting ie
>
> 1) I executed a big query and grouped the output:
> On NT: 1655.5 milliseconds
> On Linux: 3264.5 milliseconds
> 2) Big query using data caching and grouped the output:
> On NT: 415.5 milliseconds
> On Linux: 1401.5 milliseconds
>
> These are my observations and I still remember i tested this one, after i
> find some results regarding this in the list given by somebody lasttime.
>
> nagesh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 9:43 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Which Platform is most scabable for CF 4.5?
>
>
> At 21:32 10/9/00 +0800, you wrote:
> >NT is considerably faster than LINUX.
>
> This statement is based on what?
>
> And, you really meant (based on the original question)
> *Cold Fusion* is faster on NT than Linux, right?
>
> RPS
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> --
> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> To Unsubscribe visit
> http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or
> send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
> the body.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> --
> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> To Unsubscribe visit
> http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or
> send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
> the body.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> To Unsubscribe visit
> http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or
> send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in
> the body.
>
**********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential and solely
for the use of the intended recipient. They may contain
material protected by legal professional or other privilege.
If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible
for delivering to the intended recipient, you are not authorised
to and must not disclose, copy, distribute or retain this email
or its attachments. Although this email and its attachments
are believed to be free of any virus or other defect, it is the
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free
and no responsibility is accepted by the company for any
loss or damage arising from receipt or use thereof.
**********************************************************************
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
