Rick Faircloth wrote: > IMHO...too much W3C control exercised... If you don't like it, choose another option. It is your own choice to use HTML. There are plenty of other options you can use that put the security line in a different place. Only thing is that people usually are very reluctant to install the client to handle the other options, be it Java, ActiveX or something else.
Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:241369 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
