I didn't say I couldn't live with it rather than use another option...but I don't see why the W3C felt they had to force that particular security element on everyone.
It's the same problem I have with lawmakers telling me I have to wear a helmet when I ride my motorcycle...it's my head...and it should be my decision to risk injury, it's not their place to tell me I *must* have protection. (I'm in Georgia, where we have helmet laws...) Rick -----Original Message----- From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 5:18 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Any reason why a file field can be submitted back to the page it's on? Rick Faircloth wrote: > IMHO...too much W3C control exercised... If you don't like it, choose another option. It is your own choice to use HTML. There are plenty of other options you can use that put the security line in a different place. Only thing is that people usually are very reluctant to install the client to handle the other options, be it Java, ActiveX or something else. Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:241405 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
