> Is one of the CF/Ajax solutions better/easier to use in a > shared hosting environment with limited access to CF > Administrator functionality?
The short answer, no. The long answer is that AjaxCFC is more portable, and thus easier to code if you are working with a shared server (assuming you code locally and then upload the final results). The CFAjax guy might have fixed this by now, but the last release I used required you to hard code URLs into the JS. AjaxCFC works with the same code on my local server vs. my shared server because it doesn't use hard coded URLs. As far as Administrator access, I didn't need that for either framework. --------------- This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. A1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:242466 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
