Greg said: > I think us folks who like frameworks are building enterprise web > applications. . . . > ... snipped ...
and: > ... snipped ... > Unless you are completely versed in the latest FB4.1 or 5 . . . I have been watching the explosion in numbers of frameworks for CF with great interest. The second comment above about using the 'latest FB4.1 or 5' is one that concerns me. As someone who participates in building large enterprise web applications, I'd love to adopt a framework and get all of the resulting benefits that have been discussed here. But we have a hard enough time with the logistics of just upgrading versions of CF (we still haven't made the jump from CF5 to CF6\7 in my area, primarily because of an extremely aggressive application release schedule). I don't know enough about frameworks to know the answer to this question, but unless the process of modifying an enterprise application to accommodate upgrades\updates to the framework that has been used is relatively easy I don't see how we could keep up with the framework. Or am I overestimating the complexity of what is involved in upgrading to a new version of a framework? George ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:243024 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
