BD.NET is much more reliable than CF. Faster, too. And real-world clustering with failover is straightforward and supported by good third-party vendors as well as Microsoft. And you get *phenomenal* support from Vince and crew. Respectfully,
Adam Phillip Churvis Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer BlueDragon Alliance Founding Committee Get advanced intensive Master-level training in C# & ASP.NET 2.0 for ColdFusion Developers at ProductivityEnhancement.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Robert Everland III To: CF-Talk Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 10:21 AM Subject: Re: Good blog post on the frameworks debate I think they are going to transition to .NET completely because from a cost standpoint it doesn't make sense to have BlueDragon included in the cost of every web server they need. That's an additional $6,000 hit (I think that's the cost of .NET BlueDragon, correct me if wrong). If you're already writing .NET code and need BlueDragon.NET to interface with that code, then you no longer have the cost argument of training developers. Don't underestimate what you can do with .NET, you can interface just about anything with it these days. And the reason I would presume to think they are on BlueDragon.NET as opposed to J2EE is to transition away from more expensive developers. .NET has more market therefore there are more developers, hence they can get experienced coders cheaper than ColdFusion coders. That's just a presumption on my part, but one I have heard from the last few employers I have had. Bob ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:245127 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
